Creationist "Discovery" Institute Busted.
Censorship is the ...
Censorship is the historic tendency of all religious groups. Truth is the cure for religion and, deep down inside, they know it. From the censorship of Galileo to the Catholic church's demand that their parishioners not see Monty Python's "The Life of Brian", to efforts to keep evolution out of schools, the best way to keep the faithful faithful, is to keep them ignorant.
Discovery got ...
Discovery got owned ! lol, good stuff.
I hate videos like ...
I hate videos like these. Damnit!
Ahhh, creatards, ...
Ahhh, creatards, ya gotta love 'em!!!
God creates hell- ...
God creates hell-inhabitants on purpose, or god is not omniscient - make a choice
so what happened to ...
so what happened to this in the end?
Why are you using ...
Why are you using science to prove your point, every thing you need is in the bible.
Let me explain ...
Let me explain where I think you are going wrong here. For me to grasp events during a mass-less universe I had to study a lot of math, quantum mechanics etc. I can do that, I've spent 23 years studying physics. But I do decades of work on my position. You get even my work backwards, then pop a God in to clear up the mess. Sorry, with respect you can't expect anyone to take you seriously with that level of laziness. Is there something wrong with the sentence 'I don't know.'?
Allow me to show ...
Allow me to show where you contradict yourself, maybe then you can elaborate. " Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! " He didn't but it was discovered... Then you said this.. ".....natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing." But you forgot in the previous sentence that time started with the universe. With no time there was no 'before' the universe at all! To have a before you need time.
Einstein did not in ...
Einstein did not in fact demonstrate that the universe had a beginning... in fact he was dead set against the idea. It was Georges Lemaître that demonstrated the universe had a beginning, Max Planck that demonstrated where time, matter and quantum fields came from and too any to mention that covered the rest. Where does this 'Einstein proved...blah blah' come from with Christians?... Seriously is Albert Einstein the only physicist you guys heard of? You contradicted yourself.
"Einstein confirmed ...
"Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. " This is an assertion without evidence, and it also poses a problem for your God who would have had to come into existence from nothing. The cosmological argument is just a mass of special pleading.
"The supernatural ...
"The supernatural cannot be proved by science " Neither can Leprechauns, and for the exact same reason. "science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe" Your inability to come up with another option is not "scientific evidence", all you are doing is using special pleading because your faulty reasoning led you to an infinite regress. That is the exact opposite of science.
Einstein believed, ...
Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator" And Newton believed you could turn lead into gold. Luckily science is about what you can prove, not random opinions from "big scientists".
"EINSTEIN CONFIRMED ...
"EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. " This statement literally makes no sense. "Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn't be eternal. It had a beginning. " Where? Relativity doesn't actually have a lot to do with the Big Bang Theory. You should probably stop cuntpasting from creationist websites.
From your article " ...
From your article "Not all evolutionists even agree on the fossils used to support and reconstruct human evolution. " This is a laugh because Biologists are actually very consistent about what species a fossil belongs to. Creationists on the other hand will claim a bone is a human with rickets one day and a chimpanzee the next. Same creationist and same bone. Did you graduate highschool?
I see you are still ...
I see you are still serial spamming to get people to go to your website in violation of youtubes terms of service.
ALTHOUGH I'M A ...
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT ...
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED ...
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn't be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
NATURAL LIMITS TO ...
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
APES ARE QUITE ...
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
EXPLAINING HOW AN ...
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
NATURAL SELECTION ...
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE SCIENCE ...
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation. Also read my Internet article, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH! According to a Newsweek article quoting a NASA scientist, in the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (now meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil.
- good point. ...
- good point. Creationism knowledge + 5 = 4