WTC-7 Any Questions
"In contrast to all ...
"In contrast to all this, thousands of architects and engineers have proven they are not morons by publicly stating that the government's official story on WTC 7 is complete nonsense." -Mike Adams Natural News I musta forgot the quotes to cite. Sorry you fucking dumb-ass mongoloid retard that cant understand basic laws of physics. Go watch TV and believe everything the news tells you. What did you have for breakfast? A big bowl of dumbass? Wake up you retarded cunty sheep. DUMBASS
If fire is all it ...
If fire is all it takes to bring down steel-enforced buildings, then a lot of money has been wasted in all those detonating materials and equipment, when a match and a few gallons of kerosene would have done the job.
@ kirby4d: "which ...
@ kirby4d: "which is enough to cause failure" Enough, eh? Tell us, which of the buildings in the video looked worse to you in terms of the extent and duration of fire.
@ kirby4d: "They ...
@ kirby4d: "They were weakened by 40-60%" So which one is it? That is a wide margin. 40, 45, 50, 55, 60%? And how did you arrive at that those numbers when the government didn't allow any kind of testing since the evidence was hauled off to a guarded land fill?
no one except the ...
no one except the conspiraschmucks has ever said the columns melted. They were weakened by 40-60%, which is enough to cause failure. you are all as moronic as patriotic faggots
and you have proven ...
and you have proven yourself a moron for parroting what natural news said
In contrast to all ...
In contrast to all this, thousands of architects and engineers have proven they are not morons by publicly stating that the government's official story on WTC 7 is complete nonsense.
Newtons third law.. ...
Newtons third law.....for every action there is an equal and opposite re-action. If the re-action is a 47 story sky scraper made out of concrete and steel (in which steel melts at 2800-3000 degrees depending on alloys used as well as NASA thermal imaging showing only temperatures of 1600 degrees) which fell to the ground at nearly free-fall acceleration...simple office fires could not possibly (by the laws of physics) do this.
Yes, I do have a ...
Yes, I do have a question, did building A sustain 20 stories of significant structural damage on its lower floors from falling debris? No? Well this video proves absolutely nothing. You're comparing apples and oranges: 2 differently constructed buildings with the only constant being the presence of fire. Nice try.
@13falls123 glad to ...
@13falls123 glad to see that there is at least one person around these parts that doesn't wear a tinfoil hat :)
when the kink forms ...
when the kink forms, the HVAC, 'other' Penthouse, roof, facade, within 0.5 seconds from each other, have free fall ACCELERATION for 100+ft. ALL support was INSTANTLY taken away, AS WE SEE by the EVEN decent if there was a progression from east to west WE WOULD SEE IT the roof WILL NOT support itself while columns fail below it. the facade is a non supporting structure, and IS attached to the perimeter columns it will not stand while the columns fail behind it.
LOL wtf? Rude ...
LOL wtf? Rude cunt. It's the Madrid Fire in 2005
no dipshit, the ...
no dipshit, the one that didn't fall
The third tower to ...
The third tower to collapse on Sept 11 2001.
The 9/11 Official ...
The 9/11 Official Conspiracy Theory, is a very obvious in your face lie. The government's conspiracy theory is simply not even possible, it's a cartoon. The government has to lie about anything approaching half-way important to everybody, and that is one of its biggest weaknesses. It is running out of room so much it has no area left to manufacture workable lies out of anymore.
Even if one off the ...
Even if one off the support collums had been destroyed there is no way the entire bulding whould have gone into free fall as many trendys say.
It is clear that ...
It is clear that the first building was not burning on the lower floors. The first video is very unclear, and your failure to provide viewers with more information on the first building is proof of your intended deceptiveness.
what building is ...
what building is this?
man, that a tough ...
man, that a tough reality to swallow. talk about an evil plot.
9/11 FAKED INCIDENT ...
9/11 FAKED INCIDENT!!! INSIDE JOB!!!
Obvious false flag ...
Obvious false flag terror attack is obvious.
"hopefully the ...
"hopefully the illuminati is planning to kill all u dumb fuks" Ah yes, the illuminati. Only deluded, paranoid kooktards swallow the 911 conspiracy propaganda anymore. Watch out! There's a CIA agent hiding under your bed! BOO!.
Look at where all ...
Look at where all the steel collapse from around the concrete core of the first building in the video. That should tell you something :D
@poetryhound ur an ...
@poetryhound ur an asshole u stupid fuck... No sound nor flashes :s u must be blind and deaf my lad.. And the collapses shud be re-investigated properly without Marvin Bush as head... NO I'm not saying the BUSH family did this but they had foreknowledge of the event 100% ... Nd poetryhound if feel sorry for you hopefully the illuminati is planning to kill all u dumb fuks... W8 till end ov 2012 wen the japs nd china cum n fuk u over.. At least they can see past the lies go suck on ur dirtygreedy
@PoetryHound you ...
@PoetryHound you might want to see this: /watch?v=aPEpcjsJKCI