WTC7 -- This is an Orange
Keep plugging away ...
Keep plugging away; people are either going to come to their senses, or lose what few freedoms they still have left. The clock is ticking, only the truth can be of any use, now.
That's right! I ...
That's right! I have been telling people that for years! But they still think it was the "Terrorists" yeah right! ohh, and you know the airplane that hit the pentagon? yeah, the hole was about 22 feet in diameter, not really the size of the airplane "responsible" for the "attack". And even if there was a plane, it would have been shot down by the F16s inside the no-fly zone over the pentagon! you getting what I mean? *cough*missle*cough*
The terrorists in ...
The terrorists in the United States administration, with the possible help of Mossad "attacked" the United States, so that the United States had an excuse to retaliate, and get themselves and their armed forces firmly implanted in the Middle East, in order to do Israel's bidding. It was what is called a "False Flag Operation" in which it appears that an enemy is attacking you, so that you can attackt them back. The point is, you play the "enemy" to start with.
was a reason ever ...
was a reason ever given for why the "terrorists" attacked the U.S. if so, I need to know, because I must be out of the loop.
Which theorists? ...
Which theorists? The theorists who assert that 9/11 was not carried out by 19 men armed with boxcutters, or the theorists who say it was? Look at my videos, and you should see where I stand.
I don't understand, ...
I don't understand, alawson911 aren't you against the theorists?
CoverUpIn911: I ...
CoverUpIn911: I have been a director/cameraman, editor and professional voice over, and the opinions I express are my own. If I believe there were planes, does this automatically mean that I believe the U.S. government's version of what happened? The only disrespect you are showing is a disrespect for logic. Look at my other videos and see where I stand. Lies added to the U.S. government's lies, by anyone, only help the U.S. government. The truth is the only thing that matters. Find it!
Either you or simon ...
Either you or simon maybe the one is misleading/misinformation but the videos are the best evidence, not his presentation, not you,& I come to my own conclusion that the videos especially the amateur ones were faked. I just can't believe why you and the We Are Change people don't believed that when you/they believed no planes hit the Pentagon & Shanksville. Just common sense, no planes were hijacked and crashed that day, just misleading information, basically as what everybody call COVER UP!
No disrespect but ...
No disrespect but its hard to believe a 73 year old (an internet "savvy" btw) with that kind of professional voice living in Thailand (who speaks English fluently) than an ordinary guy like simonshack living in Norway who just did his research very hard (with some errors, not perfect) by using videos of evidence.
Yes, it is my voice ...
Yes, it is my voice and I am that old. Shocking, isn't it! I don't believe that any of the major New York plane videos were faked, because I can see no evidence that they were, and no one has proved that they were. I am an experienced film director and editor: all of the shots of the plane, where appropriate, can be edited together without any problems in positional continuity. As for the other two alleged plane incidents: do you expect the same movie to be showing at every theatre you visit?
I don't have to ...
I don't have to disprove anything. In the best video copies available, I can seen no discrepancies. Different camera angles, positions, distances and heights put the plane behind the Towers, or to the side and in one shot the plane can be seen right above the Towers, about 11 seconds before impact. As I suggest in the "Orange" video, don't believe what people tell you: do the research yourself, and you will see the plane when the camera position and atmospheric pollution permits.
Can you disprove ...
Can you disprove the flight path and backdrop missing in this video? /watch?v=PKeqdV7dON8 Is that your voice & are you really 73 years old? Why you won't believe TV fakery? You do believe there are no planes in Pentagon/Shanksville, right, but why believe in WTC?
Hello Gori, I am ...
Hello Gori, I am sad to hear that you have suffered because of 9/11. If you read the right history books, you will see that governments care about as much for "their" people as they do for "their" armies, which they send into battle to be slaughtered under thinly-veiled pretexts similar to the ones that the United States and Israel are currently using against Iran. Why do people enter politics? Do they really want to benefit "their" people or to use the power to benefit themselves?
thats really ...
thats really shocking. i find it really had to accept that a govt could do that to its ppl. it just makes me think what this world has come to? but im dnt denying the evidence ive herad my parents discuss this issue too and they very much believe that the govt has been involved somewhat. and im also muslim and we recieved and still receive so much racism from 9/11. i just wish the truth would come out. who are you? and what do you do?
What happened on 9/ ...
What happened on 9/11 has been the subject of a very complex cover up and disinformation campaign. A government could distance itself from the acts, but not from the cover up. The fact that the collapse of WTC7 is not even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report gives us an indication as to how involved the government was in the cover up. How involved it was in the perpetration of the events can only be guessed at, but there must have been involvement at some level of the hierarchy.
do u believe 9/11 ...
do u believe 9/11 is an inside act from the govt?
Thank you for your ...
Thank you for your apology. I've not observed what you have interpreted as thermite tearing a hole in the building, but those buildings could not have come down in the manner stated in any of the official reports. Impossible!
I must apologise, ...
I must apologise, You do have sense. I understand that not everything can be true i.e fake planes etc but this is just too obvious. take a look at wtc1 after the 'plane' hits. I swear you can see thermite tear a hole in the building-resembling burning paper. No way that that can be done by jet fuel
Some theories ...
Some theories suggest that earlier explosions, heard in WTC7 just after the Towers came down, had failed to have their desired effect. The building did contain a lot of sensitive material; possibly the records and meeting minutes for the entire operation. As for the key operatives, if you look at the passenger list for American Flight 77, it isn't hard to make the jump that they all knew too much, and were sent on their last ride, ostensibly to take part in what was supposed to be an exercise.
It is rather ...
It is rather interesting that wtc7 was evacuated before demolition, even though small fires still burned. It was a matter of eliminating evidence, and additional loss of life was not neccessary to fullfill the requirements of the mission. Also, I think that it was a matter of conscience. After so much death and destruction earlier that day, and hours to reflect upon the REALITY of their actions, commiting to a countdown and pulling another building down on fellow Americans would be tough.
Alawson911, thanks ...
Alawson911, thanks for your interest and hard work. You've given me a better sense of perspective and your logic has had a grounding effect.
"Guys on forums ...
"Guys on forums claim all kinds of things." I guess so... This was the same guy who seems to think air pressure threw the piece steel (twice the weight of a Boeing airliner according to 9/11 Mysteries) that hit the Deutche Bank Building, 400 feet from the Trade Centres (which he seemed to think were at full tenancy prior to 9/11 and thus were not white elephants).
Maybe so, but the ...
Maybe so, but the question was about thermite and thermate, not nanothermite.
Guys on forums ...
Guys on forums claim all kinds of things. Why would such a fast-burning substance only burn straight down? That's sounds absurd. You are not asking anything again, this is a new question. Your original question had to do with thermite/mate being used in shaped charges. In any event, I'm not a demolition expert; I can only use my common sense, relating to what I can research on the Internet.
Google " ...
Google "nanothermite" - unlike regular thermite it an explosive.