Lamborghini Reventon vs. Tornado
Why not to compete ...
Why not to compete with f 35.
I like it. it's ...
I like it. it's not good idea
the music reminds ...
the music reminds of Party Boy(chris pontius)
To Take off, I ...
To Take off, I think it's not a good idea.
Lamboging ahhh ...
Lamboging ahhh don't like now don't start a argue
tornado not use ...
tornado not use after burnner
well according to ...
well according to this it was
Plane its actually pronounced as re"b"enton.... :P True Story.... All it needs is one sidewinder to the car's heat signature from the exhaust, lol. It needs a GT wing. THere's just too much curves and it doesn't look badass without a GT wing. ههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههه فشل طياره طيراة ن 18 تسبك النبر قيني Wrong voice. Not believable I like it!! The day a car beats a plane is the day I won't fly anymore... Plane > Car
Always... this test was un-needed Fake I'm confused at why this would even be attempted...
Surprisingly the car that weighs less than a shopping cart has better acceleration...
Even more surprisingly a 20 million dollar fighter jet passes the car within 3 kilometers... This news is bullshit! Reventon was based on the F22 design. The Tornado isn't even stealth! It was actually inspired by the American F22 raptor jet. lol Fail. the girl sounds pretty stoned I doubt that car can beat a 1960's jet like a F4 Phantom or MiG-21 (able to reach Mach 2) or even a 1958 Boeing 707.
The thing is: Jets are immensively powerful. An internal combustion piston engine can never compete, not even if they are the equal size. The power to weight ratio and efficiency of jets is higher. 2.9 seconds to 100 km/h... commentated by an idiot =[ perfectits actually ...
All it needs is one ...
It needs a GT wing ...
...
طيراة ن 18 تسبك ...
Wrong voice. Not ...
I like it!!
The day a car ...
Plane > Car
...
Fake
I'm confused at why ...
This news is ...
It was actually ...
the girl sounds ...
I doubt that car ...
2.9 seconds to 100 ...
commentated by an ...
perfect