Vladivostok Air Tupolev Tu-204-300 Take off at Shizuoka
A beauty.
A beauty.
a very short take ...
a very short take off !!!!
It's a way of ...
It's a way of making sure the engines are spooling up correctly
Why do they ...
Why do they increase the thrust level after like 5 seconds of rolling? Why not from stop or first second?
wasnt the 757 made ...
wasnt the 757 made before the A321 though?
Agreed!
Agreed!
But they gotta ...
But they gotta improve in the safety department.
Boeing does make ...
Boeing does make great aircraft, the best airliners in the world for use between urban airports with long, paved runways and complex support infrastructure. However, I would much rather fly a well-maintained TU-154 into many rough-fields or dirt or grass strips found in places like central Siberia. Your 777 would not do well there. As for Russians in general, they do some design and engineering that is highly competitive---Like the SOYUZ TMA that our American astronauts fly to orbit in!
Boeing 777-200LR ...
Boeing 777-200LR and 777-300ER are the best in the world. Russians can't compete
Nice plane!
Nice plane!
пиздабол ты!
пиздабол ты!
Body of a 757 and ...
Body of a 757 and nose of a A321,...
согласен!
согласен!
Great video. ...
Great video. Beautiful aircraft.
Видео очень ...
Видео очень качественное, чётко передаёт атмосферу, звук. короче круто!
Actually, the ...
Actually, the Russian aircraft are aerodynamically sound and robust. The Russians have a long heritage of designing aircraft. The very first 4-engined bomber in the world was Russian (and was reliable): Ilya Muromets. The Stormoviks and MIGs are legendary, of course. The TU-154's have been flown for decades, operating in environments that American airliners would not handle. As for crashes, the vast majority have been due to poor maintenance & pilot error. As for copying, all nations do this.
disregard retards ...
disregard retards fighting... everything isn't stolen... it's copied... homogeneous if you will good designs are borrowed for efficiency and safety
tu-204 US $35 ...
tu-204 US $35 million Boeing 757-200: US$65 million / 757-300 US$80 million tu-204 is just a cheaper copy of the boeing 757
what is the ...
what is the explosion voice at 0:08 ???
totally agree, like ...
totally agree, like most of these haters probably drive hondas and have the nerves to say shit about USSR aircrafts, when infact if they were soo true to N.A. they would buy an american car. One thing they should learn is that Quality is ont necessarily related to price!!
Just because ...
Just because something may or may not cost the same as what western aircraft manufacturers charge doesn't instantly make it cheap and nasty, after all anyone can charge more for a product, this in itself doesn't make it better. Also we don't actually need all the bells and whistles that western aircraft have to actually fly the thing, you'll probably find something akin to a mid 70's flight deck would be fine today with just INS and VOR NDB operations.
what do you mean ' ...
what do you mean 'cheap'?
It is, its russian ...
It is, its russian built. No offence to the russians but most aircraft built over there are dangerous and cheap..
The plane looks so ...
The plane looks so cheap... no offense...
the left engine is ...
the left engine is smokin a wee bit