5D Cube
@TheDBZisepic Oh... ...
@TheDBZisepic Oh...well, I feel like an idiot now
There is, in maths. ...
There is, in maths. And that's how it looks like. Doesn't make much sense to a 3D creature but there you go...
No, it's your mind ...
No, it's your mind *assuming* it's 3D. But in 5D this cube doesn't stretch, it just *looks* as if it were stretching. Of course I don't think any human on this planet can actually imagine 5D, it's all just 'blind' calculations...
The sides are not ...
The sides are not stretching. It looks to us as though they are stretching but then if you look at a 3D cube rotation on a monitor it may as well seem like the sides are stretching...
i'm blind D:
i'm blind D:
the object you are ...
the object you are seeing on the screen is not five dimensional. it is ment to represent how we would see a five dimensional object in 3 dimensional space. what you are in fact seeing is a 2 dimensional representation of a 3 dimensional shadow of a 4 dimensional shadow of a 5 dimensional object. the rotation and stretching is because every point on that object is rotating at right angles to every other point.
the object you are ...
the object you are seeing on the screen is not five dimensional. it is ment to represent how we would see a five dimensional object in 3 dimensional space. what you are in fact seeing is a 2 dimensional representation of a 3 dimensional shadow of a 4 dimensional shadow of a 5 dimensional object. the rotation and stretching is because every point on that object is rotating at right angles to every other point.
lol and a two ...
lol and a two dimensional representation of that. ITS JUST SO CONFUSING!!!
the object itself ...
the object itself is not 5 dimensional. we cannot see a five dimensional object in 3 dimensional space. you are quite right. the object is not five dimensional. it is a 3 dimensional shadow of a 4 dimensional shadow of a 5 dimensional object.
in a sence, it is ...
in a sence, it is not rotating in a 3 dimensional direction. it is rotating in a five dimensional direction that cannot be seen in 3 dimensional space. what we are in fact seeing is a 2 dimensional representation of a 3 dimensional shadow of a 4 dimensional shadow of a five dimensional object. oh and to answer your question every edge is rotating at a right angle to every other edge.
wildstar this is ...
wildstar this is trippy
Physics :D
Physics :D
To me, this looks ...
To me, this looks like a more advanced 4D cube, or a tesseract. It looks like you just made one more 3D square, so you have 3 3D squares instead of just 2, as you do with a 4D cube. It's the same as drawing a third line in a picture with 2 lines, meant to demonstrate the 2nd dimension. Sure, you now have 3 lines, but that doesn't mean it's 3 dimensional, it just means it's a more advanced version of the 2 dimensional.
1011 1101 1110 1111 ...
1011 1101 1110 1111. after that, each component can take on any real number value. the 4 d cube is a theoretical object we represent in a 3d model to help us describe relationships that we lack the tools to do so otherwise. these hypercubes become the root of modeling these complex manifolds, ands help give insight to the calculus and analysis of complex valued functions.
notice when you do ...
notice when you do an f(x) = mx+b graph you take a real number x on a horizontal 1d line and map it to another real number f(x) on a vertical 1d line, and create a 2d relationship. so when mapping a complex number on a 2d plane to another complex number on a 2d plane you create a 4d relationship. now how the hell do you graph a function that is 2d by 2d? thus you create the components and relative combinations of a 4 d cube as so: 0000 0001 0010 0100 0011 0101 0110 0111 1000 1001 1010 1100 conti
notice when you do ...
notice when you do an f(x) = mx+b graph you take a real number x on a horizontal 1d line and map it to another real number f(x) on a vertical 1d line, and create a 2d relationship. so when mapping a complex number on a 2d plane to another complex number on a 2d plane you create a 4d relationship. now how the hell do you graph a function that is 2d by 2d? thus you create the components and relative combinations of a 4 d cube as so: 0000 0001 0010 0100 0011 0101 0110 0111 1000 1001 1010 1100 conti
this is an example ...
this is an example of utilizing the relative 3d components. However, what about complex valued functions. a single complex number has the form a+bi where a and b are real numbers. thus, a single complex number is representable in a 2d real valued plane by the point (a,b), whereas a single real number is representable by a single number on the 1d x axis. Now imagine this. say you have a function that maps a complex number to another complex number. (a,b) -> (c,d). continue below...
This is a tool used ...
This is a tool used in the graph theory for constructing manifolds. It is impossible to create any higher dimensional object in the 3d world we live in. How it works is notice a 3d cube can have assigned a 3 digit binary code to each vertex. eg. 000 001 010 100 011 101 110 111. This represents the components and their combinations in 3d space. For any of you who have had calculus 3 you know that you learn to plot functions of two real variables mapping to a real value. continue to next post...
The virginity in ...
The virginity in this one is strong
Wrong we see and li
Wrong we see and li
no its not, it is ...
no its not, it is just impossible to project a 5 dimensional without the appearance of a tesseract. Hence, the extra cube in the middle
Now matter how long ...
Now matter how long i look at it, its still just a 3D cube wich has extra sides and somewhat can go through itself to make a nice screensaver -.-
lol idiots you ...
lol idiots you can't show 5d even in 3d...
*died*
*died*
or that you showd ...
or that you showd us