More proof of WTC 7 lie
That's quite a ...
That's quite a statement that you make. You're implying that the FDNY is complicit in covering up a conspiracy that murdered 343 of their own. Is that what you'd have us believe?
BTW they call it ...
BTW they call it controlled demolition because when the building falls, it does not damage any of the surrounding structures hints the name "Controlled Demolition." WTC was about as far from controlled as I have ever seen.
Look at WTC 7 ...
Look at WTC 7 falling again. It is very similar (in shape) to the Murrah building in OKC. Watch the demolition of that building. The middle falls first then the two outer walls fall inward causing it to fall in its own footprint. WTC 7 just fell straight down. Another fact that conspirators wont tell you is that WTC 7 was built like 1 and 2 with no reinforced concrete. This is why the fire was able to destroy all of the buildings.
FACT: All buildings ...
FACT: All buildings that were shown demolished were CONCRETE reinforced even on the outer walls. FACT: WTC was not reinforced concrete it was steel with fireproofing sprayed in it. This is why it "crumbled." Even the Madrid building which caught fire was concrete. Conspirators ALWAYS overlook this. Yes concrete reinforcement drastically changes a buildings structure. This is the first time a building built with this design has fallen for any reason.
You're so full of ...
You're so full of shit.
I have called the ...
I have called the twoof cult evil because it seeks to exonerate murderous terrorists of a heinous crime. I don't know if you are a twoofer. There are no questions regarding the building collapses that have not been answered to the satisfaction of the worldwide community of structural engineers.
The only question ...
The only question at this point is were all the cameras too distant to audibly record demolition sounds? You tell me!! watch?v=obJe66QHx_Y&feature=related And to answer your question. NO!!. And i speak from experience because i have done exactly this with a 25 story office building implosion. I can assure you had ANY of the buildings had explosives in them believe me!!... there isn't a soul in lower Manhattan who would miss this. Maybe if you were Helen Keller locked in the basement.
My first thoughts ...
My first thoughts when I came down a little further into the site, south of Chambers Street, was, "Where am I?" I didn't recognize it. Obviously, the towers were gone. The only thing that remained standing was a section of the Vista Hotel. Building 7 was on fire. That was ready to come down. --Charlie Vitchers, Ground Zero Superintendent
Building #7 was ...
Building #7 was still actively burning and at that time we were advised by a NYFD Chief that building #7 was burning out of control and imminent collapse was probable. --PAPD P.O. Edward McQuade
The ONLY place all ...
The ONLY place all of this B 7 storied nonsense exists is on Youtube. Does anyone take the time to get credible "REAL" information on this subject? No!! Its just Alex Jones and all of this other bullshit that jerks off the "TM" in to hearing what they want to hear. You people don't realize that its YOU who are being scammed by people who have air time to fill. Go and read the "firemen oral histories" of 911. Interviews with all the key battalions. Everyone KNEW 7 was going to come down
I don't know what ...
I don't know what footage, film or eyewitness accounts you have heard, but nothing I've looked at or heard aligns with your claim that "all 47 stories were on fire." Perhaps you have a link for us, or maybe you can reply to the video.
This is a sensible ...
This is a sensible flow of logic and from what I understand true signs present during demolition. The only question at this point is were all the cameras too distant to audibly record demolition sounds?
Wow, you do pledge ...
Wow, you do pledge allegiance to the 9/11 Commission Report. That is something that I find truly amazing, considering evidence was still under evaluation long after its completion.
What do you believe ...
What do you believe happened? Do you pledge allegiance to the 9/11 Commission Report?
It is growing ever ...
It is growing ever difficult to take your rebuttals as an individual seriously, as you have openly called me "evil," and a "cult" member. It is not that you are biased toward one thing or another. The problem is that you are not looking at the evidence impartially. The puzzle pieces around the tower collapse have answers you are willing to accept, fine, but are other questions, and there are many, also answered in your opinion?
I have been ...
I have been thinking deeply about what, if anything, could mask or suffocate such audible noises that are always present in demolition type video. I was unable to find any demolition footage where nano type thermite was strictly used. Does anyone have any footage of this type of demolition? Is there any footage of a much more silent type of demolition? These details will help the truth movement.
Anyone that was too ...
Anyone that was too young to remember 9/11, here watching this upload..This message is for you. There is an authentic wtc attack chronicle from a first person perspective uploaded on my channel. It is the most complete continuous running; account, that has ever surfaced from that day. It is something that those that watched the news coverage that day - have not experienced. By merely listening to the real-documentary, your experiential paradigm may be more naturally grounded than theirs.
You have been ...
You have been conned by two frauds, Neils Harrit and Steven Jones. Their own data proves that NO thermitic material was present in WTC dust. Now Dr. James Millette's definitive study buries the thermite myth for good.
I am biased against ...
I am biased against agenda-driven nonsense masquerading as science. Try 911myths(dot) com.
There are public ...
There are public domain news releases with cited structural engineers - yes that is plural - on scholars for 9/11 truth and the AE site you so clearly loathe. I plan to also read those along with thousands of other pages of claims. It is very difficult to keep up with all the material. In the future, try to make statements that are not so emotionally and politically charged. You will not be able to mask your obvious bias with that approach.
Who's to define the ...
Who's to define the audible properties of overhauled military-grade nanothermite from quite far away? I'm not saying I know how it sounds, but you are. Who's making conjectures? A funny thing, too, because opponents have labeled NANOTHERMITE PARTICLES AS PAINT - i.e. Mark Roberts. It's not paint, obviously, or it wouldn't react in lab tests as it did.
Gage's gaggle of ...
Gage's gaggle of frauds and fools includes many America-hating academics from humanities departments, but almost no structural engineers. The few who have signed his petition are either long-retired or demonstrably insane (Pegelow thinks the towers were nuked). There is a reason why these clowns will NEVER face a real structural engineer in open debate.
Those loud sounds ...
Those loud sounds are explosions. Some of us get the idea that stuff blows up in office fires. People heard RANDOM explosions. ABSOLUTELY NOBODY heard the near-simultaneous series of blasts followed immediately by the collapse of the structure that characterizes a controlled demolition. That's because it didn't happen. There is a reason why demolition professionals reject your evil cult's lies.
There can be no " ...
There can be no "progress" because your movement is wrong. The truth is the official story, but you won't accept that because it makes you feel important to "spread truth" to all and sundry.
Because of people ...
Because of people like you, its progress is resisted and our names are unfairly discredited because you, who are too busy enjoying your ESPN HD and iTunes.