AMD FX Black Edition "Bulldozer" and 990FX Dirt 3 system demo
isnt the fx 6200 2+ ...
isnt the fx 6200 2+2+2 ?
What? 2500k ...
What? 2500k obsolete? how? lol An FX6200 with 3+3 cores mashed together won't beat a 2500k with HT.
Around with 2500k, ...
Around with 2500k, and a cpu now obsolete, are about three years going around in the market, it costs much more than a FX6200 which is close to its performance.
Intel overall has ...
Intel overall has better CPU's, but this CPU is less expensive than a i5 2500k, has a higher clock speed, and double the cores. Like this one, some AMD CPU's are really good deals :)
that's ...
that's surprisingly cheep...
Intel overall has ...
Intel overall has better CPU's, but this CPU is less expensive than a i5 2500k, has a higher clock speed, and double the cores.
159 Euro's / ~210 ...
159 Euro's / ~210 USD
8 cores is just ...
8 cores is just fuckin ridiculous. how much will it cost?
Any one know case ...
Any one know case model?
I'll probably build ...
I'll probably build an FX next year, depending on how well it does.
Yes, you talked ...
Yes, you talked about CPUs with iGPU. But obviously you don't know anything about Bulldozer and you weren't aware that Orochi has no iGPU. But this seems typical for your. You showed more than once that you are just here to provoke and troll, making completely absurd claims. Unlike you I'm definitely not a fanboy. I'm just a fan of innovative hardware concepts. And Bulldozer's cluster-based design is definitely one of those, at least in the x86 market.
I never claimed ...
I never claimed there were any BD's with GPU-core, and it all comes back to how delusional and unintentionally funny your fanboy-attitude is. ;)
1. Lies make you ...
1. Lies make you look even dumber. 2. FX is faster than its predecessor, up to twice as fast, not slower. 3. With the right software support, FX also beats i5/i7 in most multithreaded applications. 4. OC potential is very good for FX. 5. There's not only the top FX. Other models are much less power hungry. 6. You still don't get it. Orochi is a server design and FX is a salvage part. So, comparisons with SB are partially pointless and FX sales are secondary.
YOU definitely have ...
YOU definitely have no idea what you're talking about. You said "the crappy fusion/sb integrated GPU-core". There is no integrated GPU in Bulldozer yet. You are completely wrong or off-topic. Just trying to find stupid arguments to rant against some great technology. Go and troll elsewhere!
To quote you: "The ...
To quote you: "The top FX costs here over €200. That's in the price range of i5 2500 / i7 2600. I don't see what's wrong with that." There's plenty wrong with that when the top FX doesnt even perform as well as their own previous generation of chip, and gets completley hit out of the ballpark by the 25/26k in sheer performance, overclocking potential and power consumption etc etc etc. Fail some more.
You clearly have no ...
You clearly have no idea what I'm talking about since I never claimed Bulldozer was Fusion, I was talking about the current APU's from AMD. The rest of your inane rant is just plain funny. Please pick another detail to get wrong and then build some stupid argument out of. The more you go on, the sillier you become. ;)
1. Grab it 2. Run ...
1. Grab it 2. Run fast as shit 3. ??? 4. Profit!
I don't know what ...
I don't know what you are talking about. Bulldozer is not Fusion yet. Trinity will be the first Fusion chip based on Bulldozer. But thanks for another example that you don't know anything about Bulldozer. And yes, iGPUs are crappy. But only if you know Intel. ;) Trinity's iGPU won't be far away from my HD 5750. The industry is quite sure, iGPUs are the future. Discrete graphics will disappear. But live on in your little niche world, where everyone needs high-end graphics for games.
You do know ...
You do know bulldozer doesn't have 8 "full" cores right? Thats why it fails so much compared to the old Phenoms x6 or Intel i5s CPU has no real impact on how fast you can open files. That's all down to how fast your HDD or SSD is.
Not in my computer ...
Not in my computer playboy, everything is 2 times faster. All music/files opens almost instantaneously. All my games at ultra high deff 8 cores super fast and only for a cheap $200.00 and if id like i can OC to 4.5 but what for? Don't need too. Stocks runs like a beast. " Fail some more" That can only mean one thing your a mini playboy :)
I use a discrete ...
I use a discrete graphic card (unlocked Radeon 6950). If I were only interested in checking e-mails and playing farmville I'd probably be happy with the crappy fusion/sb integrated GPU-core. But pulling that as an argument under a video demonstration in regards to performance and enthusiast level computing is just so sad and silly. You stick with your Fusion tech and play farmville, meanwhile I'll stick with my 2500k + unlocked 6950, SSD, fast 8GB DDR3.
2500k outperforms ...
2500k outperforms AMDs best bulldozer chip. 2500k is cheaper. Fail some more.
The money in my ...
The money in my wallet vice versa.
Benchmarks say ...
Benchmarks say otherwise.
Nah same shit HD on ...
Nah same shit HD on all games. Intel is like alienware you're just paying for the name.